The Philadelphia Eagles got off on the wrong foot even before they faced the Arizona Cardinals on Nov. 13. When the Eagles benched DeSean Jackson(notes) for missing a team meeting the previous day, Philadelphia fans like myself had to be weary off the bat.
We still thought it wouldn’t affect the Birds’ ability to defeat the 2-6 Cardinals, especially when a loss would have destroyed what was left of the season. But now that the Eagles have suffered a 21-17 defeat, the temptation is to blame Jackson for getting himself benched or Andy Reid for sitting him in the first place.
With Jackson out and Jeremy Maclin(notes) getting himself injured early, Michael Vick(notes) certainly didn’t have reliable weapons. And without Jackson to use as a decoy, it could have given the Cardinals’ secondary more room to roam. However, his benching is just one more scapegoat that the Eagles cannot use as an excuse.
Jackson wasn’t the one who threw balls off target that neither he nor any other receiver could have caught. Vick was the cause of that, as he never found a groove and was wild with the ball all day long. And it wasn’t Jackson who still decided to let Vick keep throwing the ball away instead of letting one of the NFL’s leading rushers take control of the offense. Reid did that by letting LeSean McCoy(notes) get just 14 carries while Vick heaved the ball 34 times – although he didn’t have Jackson or accuracy on his side.
Jackson wasn’t the one who let Cardinals’ backup quarterback John Skelton(notes) throw for an inexplicable 315 yards. He also didn’t let Larry Fitzgerald(notes) run wild in the fourth quarter to catch tapped balls and set up tying and game winning touchdowns. Those were the sins of the Philadelphia defense – as if it didn’t have enough to atone for during fourth quarters.
As I stated earlier, there was little reason to suspect that losing Jackson would be enough to lose to the 2-6 Cardinals. Even without him, the Eagles should have had the bare minimum to beat an Arizona team that didn’t even have Kevin Kolb(notes) in action to get revenge. Even if the Eagles had Jackson, there was reason to believe that it wouldn’t have turned out any better for them, especially with his lack of big plays all season.
It wasn’t like Philadelphia was winning with Jackson on the field, and now there is less reason to suggest that it can win when he comes back. One player cannot win or lose a game – although the Peyton Manning(notes)-less Indianapolis Colts could probably poke holes in that argument. But with the Eagles, it took a team effort – or a lack of one – to not bail Jackson or Reid out for their latest controversy.
Robert Dougherty is a life-long Philadelphia resident who has followed the Eagles since he was eight years old.
Other stories by this contributor
Eagles blown out by Cardinals in every way but final score
Jets aim at another struggling contender in Patriots
Eagles now need 49ers to knock Giants down a peg
Eagles, Cardinals keep sliding after 2009 NFC title game
Coughlin keeps winning for Giants despite being hated
Note: This article was written by a Yahoo! contributor. Sign up here to start publishing your own sports content.
That’s all for today guys, i’ll be back to blog you tomorrow.



